Six foot high fencing plans for Nailsea primary school
By Carol_Deacon | Wednesday, May 04, 2011, 09:12
A Nailsea head teacher has said he cannot ‘guarantee the safety of the children’ in his care without installing a security fence around his school.
-
The beautiful open vista of the school with the hills behind pictured at a PTA fair last summer
Head teacher Kevin Lynch told Nailsea town councillors he fears for pupil safety because of the number of people who wander onto the site throughout the school day.
The popular 440-pupil Golden Valley Primary School is surrounded on three sides by playing fields with open views across to the Mendip Hills.
Along the other side runs a bridleway which is owned by Nailsea Town Council and leads to Golden Valley Veterinary Hospital.
Mr Lynch told the planning and environment committee said he had been looking with the governors at installing fencing around the school.
Two other schools in Nailsea have already installed security fencing.
But councillors were as horrified with the latest proposal which would encase an undulating green field with six foot high metal railings as they had been at the previous planning application from the Pound Lane schools.
Despite a petition from neighbours a 2.4m high security fence was installed at Kingshill C of E Primary School and Ravenswood Special School in 2005.
At the time Kingshill chair of governors Lynn Franklin told the town council ‘this is to ensure the safety of the children and our insurance company recommends that vulnerable sites are protected by fencing’.
And Ravenswood chair of governors Janet Midda said ‘currently a lack of secure fencing…puts the children at extreme risk’.
Building a fence around Golden Valley will cost thousands and thousands of pounds which would pay for ‘an awful lot of books’ said councillor Anita Heappey.
Mr Lynch said the school was became a haunt for vandals who have repeatedly daubed graffiti on a storeroom and caused damage by climbing on the flat roof.
Dog walkers, cyclists and horse riders frequently disturb outdoor lessons and sporting activities and ignore polite requests from teachers to move away, he told the meeting.
The single-storey Nailsea Park primary school was built 35 years ago.
The building became more exposed in 2003 when temporary classrooms which shielded on one side from the bridlepath were removed when a large extension was completed.
Councillor Phil Barclay questioned ‘impinging’ on people’s rights if a barrier was installed along the bridlepath which is a public-right-of-way.
Councillor Liz Frappell said: “It will look like Stalag 21.
“I was against the security fencing they have installed at Kingshill and Ravenswood.”
Council chairman Rod Lees said he was ‘totally opposed’ to the idea of fencing which would make the school look like ‘a concentration camp’.
He said: “I know the safety of children is sacrosanct but the residents of nearby Oaksey Grove will be up-in-arms.”
Mr Lynch said: “It is a beautiful site but it isn’t about ascetics it is about the safety of children and we can’t guarantee the safety of our children.”
Mr Barclay added: “One of the delights of walking along the bridlepath is looking across to Golden Valley and seeing the children at play.
“It is regrettable that the safety aspect will probably outweigh environmental considerations if the school sought permission for the fencing.”
The councillors decided they would wait for a formal planning application before making a recommendation on the playing field which is partly owned by Nailsea School.
After the meeting Mr Lynch said the security fence proposals were only in the early stages and no consultation had yet been carried out with parents or local residents.
Mr Lynch said: "We have to look at the future and the need to improve security over the next couple of years.
"We do have a lovely outlook but we have to make sure the children are secure and safe at all times.
"Currently there is no visible boundary around the school.
"We do not want to turn the site into a fortress but at the moment we feel the school is very exposed.
"Our children are supervised at all times but currently we cannot stop people from walking onto the school site.
"It is important to stress that there have not been any incidents at the school with strangers in the grounds and the issue of fencing was raised as a result of a security review at the school.
"We raised the issue with Nailsea Town Council because we share the ownership of the wall that runs along the bridlepath.
"We are more than happy to discuss our plans with the community when they are more firmly established."
Comments
As an elected body I cannot beleive that Nailsea Town Council are sat in their Ivory Towers not concerned with child safety. The site is littered with glass some mornings after a hot weekend. There have been various incidents of unsepervised dogs running around the school during breaks. Road safety is also an issue as the main road is easily accesable from the main field. Although my children do not go to golden valley I used to and can readily see the dangers. Its just as well the children are well supervised otherwise anything could have happened, I am not saying that there will be an incident but nothing should be left to chance - Ceri
By cerijohn72 at 10:37 on 06/05/11
ReportOur childrens safety is any parents priority and I thank Golden Valley for wanting a 1.8 meter high fence. This shouldn't be up for discussion. Just look at Kingshill, Hannah More and Grove, it's not unsightly its a sign of the times. Our children come first.
By ASF1976 at 09:23 on 06/05/11
ReportI believe that a metal fence will look unsightly and will have a negative effect on the atmosphere around the school. Children are safe on the school site and do not need to be fenced in for their own protection. The greatest risk to children are from the cars on the main road. There are no busy roads to the rear of the school and the front of the school is fenced. The whole field does not belong to the school so a fence would not stop the teenagers using the field, although I have never found their use and enjoyment of the field in the evenings to be a great problem.
By E12345 at 17:19 on 05/05/11
ReportI cannot believe the attitude of Nailsea Town Council on this issue. Do they realise that we are living in the 21st Century and live in an age when the health and safety, particularly of children, HAS to take priority over aesthetics? As a local resident to the school I would welcome anything that will stop the congregation of youths drinking and shouting into the evening, so how Rod Lees can say the residents would be 'up in arms' I don't know. I've never met the man let alone had the chance to tell him what I think about local issues. The comments of the members of the Town Council referring to World War Two are not only offensive but clearly tells me something about the age and attitude of our councillors - it's time to move out of the Jurassic Age and into the 21st century.
Why is the bridle path so precious, more precious than children's safety? I can't ever recall seeing a horse going along there in the six years I have lived here!
As for the outlook over the 'undulating green fields' (not sure where they are?) it won't change and after a short while local residents will have forgotten that there wasn't a fence there. Mr Barclay will still be able to watch the children at play and as for books Mrs Heappey, is that really relevant or indeed any of your business?
My child is due to start school soon and whilst the excellent reputation of the school attracts me, security concerns me. I shall be watching with interest.
By MaddieNailsea at 22:40 on 04/05/11
Report